Qualcomm files new patent infringement complaints against Apple

The countersuits square measure flying once more within the endless legal battle between Apple and Qualcomm.

In the latest development, Qualcomm filed 3 new violation complaints against Apple during a U.S.A. District Court, declarative a complete of sixteen extra patents that Apple is presently victimization in its iPhones.


The patent complaints vary from power-management technologies to optical device cameras. 5 of the patents are enclosed during a new criticism filed within the International Trade Commission. just like the patents Qualcomm declared at the ITC in July, all of the extra sixteen patents square measure non-standards essential patents enforced outside of the electronic equipment.

According to Qualcomm, Apple is victimization every of those patents in its devices while not paying for them.

"Apple is that the example example of a corporation partaking in patent hold-out, and has repeatedly pursued a patent hold-out strategy victimization its monumental monetary resources to damage innovators of technologies it uses," Qualcomm aforementioned during a legal filing. The chipmaker declined to comment on the far side the filings.

The legal battle between the 2 technical school titans has raged since Jan, once Apple filed a suit against Qualcomm accusative the semiconductor large of overcharging for chips and withholding nearly $1 billion in written agreement rebate payments. Apple's suit additionally claimed that Qualcomm created Associate in Nursing "abusive licensing model" that enabled the corporate to demand excessive royalties.

In June, Apple filed a quick to its original case accusative Qualcomm of "double-dipping" by charging a patent licensing fee for the employment of its technology and another fee for the chip itself.

Qualcomm then filed a criticism with the ITC asking it to bar the import of some iPhones and different product into the U.S.A.. That criticism was tied to Apple's call to withhold royalty payments to contract makers till the legal dispute with Qualcomm was resolved -- that crystal rectifier to a different counter suit filed by Apple's suppliers. therein suite, Qualcomm was defendant of violating 2 sections of the Sherman Act, a landmark U.S.A. law.

Qualcomm eventually convinced the ITC to open a hunt into whether or not the importation of the iPhone seven, beside numerous device elements like baseband processor modems, violates the Tariff Act of 1930.

In November, Qualcomm sued Apple once more, declarative that Apple shared proprietary ASCII text file with rival Intel. a choice by the ITC could lead on to a ban on iPhones victimization Intel chips from being foreign into the U.S.A..